Comment published in NY Times comments section on "Forget ‘Pat the Bunny.’ My Child Is Reading Hemingway" (Dec. 18, 2016). http://tinyurl.com/jlgjuty
Stephen Krashen
Several of those who have commented on this article point out that
classic comics tried to do something similar to re-casted classics for tots:
Make classics more comprehensible to younger readers.
There is evidence that they were not very popular with children.
Wayne (1954) asked 297 seventh-grade students to indicate which
comic types they preferred; each student was asked to choose four from a list
of 15. Classic comics ranked ninth out of 15.
When are asked which comics they prefer, without a list to choose
from, class comics are never mentioned (for a review of these studies, seeWitty
and Sizemore 1954).
Michael Dirda shares his enthusiasm for comic books, but tells us
“I never really cottoned to the earnest and didactic ‘classic comics’ … Who
would pick up something called The
Cloister and the Hearth ….?” (Dirda, 2003, p. 56).
Some Classics Illustrated comics are still appearing: The Last of
the Mohicans was published in July 2016.
It was not listed, nor were any other classics, in the November 2016
list of the 371 best-selling comic books in the US (http://www.comichron.com/monthlycomicssales/2016/2016-11.html).
Dirda, M. 2003. An open book. New York: W.W. Norton and
Company.
Wayne, R. 1954. Survey of interest in comic books. School
Activities 25: 244.
Witty, P., and R. Sizemore. 1955. Reading the comics: A
summary of studies and an evaluation, III. Elementary English 32: 109-114.
No comments:
Post a Comment