A Weapon of Mass
Distraction
Stephen Krashen
PARCC* is now inviting
us to review performance level descriptions and an “accommodation” manual” to
help them develop more tests (http://parcconline.org/reminder-parcc-seeks-public-comment).
As usual, we are not
invited to discuss whether we need these tests. For those who haven't been
paying attention, the US Department of Education, through PARCC, is planning to
impose more testing than has ever been seen on this planet, far more than is
helpful or necessary.
Those who accept the
invitation to discuss performance level descriptions and the accommodation
manual will have the impression they have a seat at the table. In reality, these
kinds of invitations are a means of control, diverting attention from the real
issues.
"The smart way to
keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of
acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum … That
gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time
the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the
range of the debate" (N. Chomsky, The Common Good, p. 42, 2002)
The problem in
American education is not a lack of appropriate tests. The problem is poverty.
Our students from middle-class families who attend well-funded schools score at
the top of the world on international tests, and when poverty is controlled
statistically, American students rank near the top of the world.
The US has the highest
level of child poverty among all industrialized countries. If all our children
were protected from the effects of poverty our overall international test
scores would be spectacular.
Poverty means little
health care, poor nutrition and little access to books and has a devastating
effect on school achievement. The best teaching is ineffective when children
are hungry, ill, and have nothing to read. The impact of poverty could be
profoundly reduced if we invested more on food programs, health care, and
libraries, instead of on useless standards and tests.
We have been told not
to worry about these things but support the movement to invest instead in more
testing, and to debate whether the proposed rubrics for the fourth-grade
writing assessment are appropriate.
Susan Ohanian notes
that issuing standards is like presenting menus to starving people. Now PARCC
is inviting us to discuss what should be on the menu.
“PARCC is an alliance
of states working together to develop common assessments serving nearly 24
million students.”
We just did the PARCC field test for the 4th grade social studies test today. It took about 45 minutes to get everyone online and deal with all technical glitches. Once in, it took about an hour to an hour and a half to finish the test. From what I saw, the questions asked were fine, a lot more higher order thinking skills than previous tests. If we're going to this kind of test, then we need to drop a lot of the reading curriculum we currently use which does nothing to foster higher order thinking skills.
ReplyDelete