S
Krashen (www.sdkrashen.com; twitter;
skrashen; facebook Stephen Krashen)
ECIS ESLMT conference
Two views of
language/literacy development
A.
The comprehension hypothesis: we acquire language
when we understand it.
1. grammar,
vocabulary = RESULT of language acquisition
2. pleasant
immediately
B.
The skill building hypothesis: first learn about
language, practice rules
1. grammar,
vocabulary learned first, then you can use the language
2. delayed gratification
(that never arrives)
3. Superiority of
methods based on comprehensible input:
http://skrashen.blogspot.com/2014/08/comprensible-input-based-methods-vs.html
Second/foreign language acquisition: TPR,
Natural Approach, TPRS
Intermediate second/foreign language
acquisition (sheltered subject matter teaching)
Literacy: success of whole language over
heavy phonics methods
Special case of the comprehension
hypothesis: the reading hypothesis - the source of our reading
ability, writing ability (writing style), vocabulary, spelling, grammar)
The case for free
voluntary reading
SSR = sustained silent reading The Fiji Island study (RRQ,
1983): Elley & Mangubhai
Grade
|
ALM
|
SSR
|
Big Books
|
4
|
6.5
|
15
|
15
|
5
|
2.5
|
9
|
15
|
year 2:
larger differences, readers better in writing, listening and grammar
Richard Wright: “I bought English grammars and found
them dull. I felt I was getting a better sense of the language from novels than
from grammars."
Predictors
of performance on the Spanish subjunctive by English speakers
Predictor
|
Beta
|
p-value
|
Study
|
0.0052
|
0.72
|
Residence
|
0.051
|
0.73
|
Reading
|
0.32
|
0.034
|
subjunctive
study
|
0.045
|
0.76
|
From: Stokes,
Krashen & Kartchner, 1998
UK Study: Sullivan and Brown: Predictors of scores on
vocabulary test given at age 42
1.
Reading at age 42 counts, independent of reading at 16 or younger &
previous vocabulary.
2.
Fiction counts: high-brow and middle-brow, but not low-brow
3.
Reading counts even when control for subjects' & parent education, parent
occupation
Sullivan,
A. & Brown, M. 2014. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, University of London
Compelling
Comprehensible Input: So
interesting not aware of language, sense of time, sense of self diminishes =
Flow (Csíkszentmihályi): the end of motivation
Case
histories: language acquisition never the goal, but a by-product. It was the
story.
1.
Paul: Cantonese
& English speaker, acquired Mandarin from cartoons and lots of TV shows,
movies, with no particular motivation to acquire Mandarin. (Lao, C. and Krashen, S. 2014. Language acquisition without
speaking and without study. Journal
of Bilingual Education Research and Instruction 16(1): 215-221;
http://sdkrashen.com/articles.php?cat=6)
2.
Fink
(1996/6) 12 former dyslexics. 9 published creative or scholarly works. 11
learned to read between 10-12, one in 12th grade. “As children, each had a passionate personal
interest, a burning desire to know more about a discipline that required
reading … all read voraciously, seeking and reading everything they could get
their hands on about a single intriguing topic."
2nd/foreign
language education in terms of compellingness: traditional > TPR >
Natural Approach > TPRS
The END OF MOTIVATION: It's
the story that counts
Language & literacy development = by-product
The extreme
pleasure of self-selected reading
"perhaps
the most often mentioned flow activity in the word (Csikzentmihalyi, 1991)
-resident
of Italy - when he reads, “I immediately immerse myself in the reading, and the
problems I usually worry about disappear” (Massimini, Csikzentmihalyi, &
Della Faye, 1992.)
-
A reader interviewed by Nell (1988): “reading removes me ... from the
irritations of living ... for the few hours a day I read ‘trash’ I escape the
cares of those around me, as well as escaping my own cares and
dissatisfactions.
-
Somerset Maugham, in Nell (1988): “Conversation, after a time, bores me, games
tire me, and my thoughts, which we are told are the unfailing resources of a
sensible man have a tendency to run dry. Then I fly to my book as the
opium-smoker to his pipe ...”
Nell: reading before
you go to sleep - level of arousal increased during reading, declined just
after reading below original level
- 24/26 pleasure readings read in bed “nearly every night” or “most
nights” (p. 250).
“Even if I read for only five minutes, I must do it - a compulsion like
that of a drug addict!”
“My addiction to reading is such
that I almost can’t sleep without a minimum of ten minutes (usually 30-60
minutes) of reading” (Nell, p. 250).
Develops Knowledge: Stanovich & colleagues: those
who read more know more about literature, history, science, have more
"cultural literacy," "practical knowledge."
Habits of mind
(1) reading
quality fiction develops an expanded "capacity
to identify and understand others’ subjective states" (Kidd and Castano,
2013).
(2) fiction readers also have more
tolerance for vagueness (Djikic, M., Oatley, K. & Moldoveanu, M. 2013).
Free voluntary
reading & career success: “omnivorous reading in childhood and adolescence
correlates positively with ultimate adult success" (Simonton, 1988)
Emery & Csikszentmihalyi (1982): impact of print-rich environment
Malcolm X: ‘What’s your alma
mater?’
Michael Faraday (1791-1867): influence of working for
a bookbinder for 7 years.
Let's stop trying
to "motivate" young people to read. Let's try making sure they have
access to compelling reading material.
The three stages
STAGE ONE; READ-ALOUDS & STORIES
A.
children
read to regularly make superior gains in reading, vocabulary, listening.
Reach
out and Read: in clinic
waiting rooms in high poverty areas. free book; staff demonstrates in waiting
room, physician gives a book
Mendelsohn
et. al. age 4, 3 years of ROR; average of three appointments, 4 books received:
Vocabulary Acquisition
Expressive
|
Receptive
|
|
Comparison n = 49)
|
80.9
|
85.2
|
ROR (n = 73)
|
85.2
|
93.7
|
national norm
|
100
|
100
|
Gap
|
19.9
|
14.8
|
% gap closed
|
4.3/19.9=22%
|
8.5/14.8=57%
|
Means adjusted for differences between the groups, e.g. mother's
education, language spoken in the home, homelessness, preschool attendance,
child's age.
B.
Read-alouds are pleasant: Vast majority of children say that they enjoy being
read to.
C. Encourages
reading, which in turn promotes literacy development.
D.
2nd/Foreign language education and stage one: TPRS!
STAGE TWO: SELF-SELECTED PLEASURE READING
A.
the
bridge: massive evidence that self-selected FVR builds literacy, knowledge
B.
Reading
narrow, self-selected
As
a conduit: Bishop Desmond
Tutu: " … one of the things I am very grateful to (my father) for is
that, contrary to conventional educational principles, he allowed me to read
comics. I think that is how I developed
my love for English and for reading."
STAGE THREE: ACADEMIC READING =
specialized reading: in an area of your interest, to answer a question/solve a
problem: Typically
narrow and selective.
Stages 2 and 3: Narrow, self-selected.
The alternative: Formal study
- complexity:
grammatical complexity, text structure complexity, vocabulary complexity &
size
- failure
of direct instruction in the research: always loses to free voluntary reading.
The alternative: Subject matter study.
BUT: classroom
discourse is closer to conversational language than to academic language.
(Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and
written registers. New York: John Benjamins)
No comments:
Post a Comment