Access to books helps close the literacy gap in kindergarten
Stephen Krashen
Fryer and Levitt (2004) examined reading and math test scores in
kindergarten and grade 1 from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (about
1000 schools). Their focus was the gap between black and white children.
For reading, the difference between black and white children at the
start of kindergarten was .40 (where 0 = mean, sd = 1). Thus, black children
scored 40% of a standard deviation below white children.
When Fryer and Levitt controlled for SES, (parents occupation, parent
occupation, household income), the gap dropped to .134.
When they controlled for SES and number of children's books in the home
the gap dropped to nearly zero, -.006.
This is a major result: the presence of children's books evens the
playing field. And this is only for a test given at the start of kindergarten.
Sadly, this report was buried deep in the paper: "Including number of
books …. completely eliminates the gap in reading" (p. 452).
This result is consistent with studies that show that supplying even a
modest number of books for read alouds to parents of young children of poverty
helps close the vocabulary gap between children of poverty and national norms.
(For a review of "Reach out and Read" studies, see Krashen, 2011).
The finding is also consistent with studies done with older readers showing
that access to a library can ameliorate the effect of poverty on reading
achievement (Krashen, Lee and McQuillan, 2012).
When Fryer and Levitt controlled for more predictors, including age the
child was when in kindergarten, birth weight, if the mother was a teenage
mother at first birth, if the mother was 30 or older at first birth, the
characteristics of neighborhood, whether the mother worked, preschool program
participation, parental involvement in child's life, family size and structure,
the difference was .093: Black children did slightly better.
References:
Fryer, R. and Levitt, S. 2004. Understanding the
black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. The Review of
Economics and Statistics 86 (2): 447-464.
Krashen, S. 2011. Reach out and read (aloud). Language
Magazine 10 (12): 17-19. (languagemagazine.com/?page_id=2688)
Krashen, S., Lee, S.Y. and McQuillan, J. 2012. Is the
library important? Multivariate studies at the national and international
level. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1): 26-36. (http://sdkrashen.com/articles.php?cat=2)
No comments:
Post a Comment