Response to (“We Need to
Talk About the Tests,” Op-Ed, April 10), published under the heading
"A Need to Go Public With Test Data"
Published in the New York Times, April
16, 2014
Yes, there’s a big problem with the state tests. But there’s
a bigger problem: the whole idea of the Common Core standards. Accurately
described by Susan Ohanian, a writer and former teacher, as “a radical untried
curriculum overhaul” and “nonstop national testing,” the Common Core is an
outrageous scheme with no justification and no empirical support.
The
problems described by Elizabeth Phillips will eventually be solved, or at least
reduced enough to stop complaints from coming, but the Common Core boondoggle
will continue, with new and very expensive tests delivered online.
I
suspect that these bad tests are a weapon of mass distraction, so that we
forget what the real problem is.
STEPHEN
KRASHEN
Los Angeles, April 11, 2014
Los Angeles, April 11, 2014
The writer is professor emeritus at
Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California.
This letter and other responses: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/17/opinion/a-need-to-go-public-with-test-data.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0
Original version:
Yes, there's a big problem with the tests ("We
need to talk about the tests," April 10). but there's a bigger problem:
The whole idea of the common core. Accurately described by Susan Ohanian
as “a radical untried curriculum
overhaul and ... nonstop national testing," the common core is an
outrageous scheme with no justification and no empirical support.
The problems described by Elizabeth Phillips will
eventually be solved, or at least reduced enough to stop complaints from
coming, but the common core boondoggle will continue, with new and very
expensive tests delivered online.
I suspect that the tests are horrible on purpose, to
encourage resistance and debate over
details. When changes are made, it will give critics a sense of
accomplishment, while they forget what the real problem is. The lousy tests are
a weapon of mass distraction.
Stephen
Krashen
No comments:
Post a Comment