Protecting
children from poverty a better investment than the common core.
Submitted
to the New York Times
Re:
Who's minding the schools? June 9. (Andrew Hacker and Claudia Drefus)
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/opinion/sunday/the-common-core-whos-minding-the-schools.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Hacker
and Drefus' statement that attacks on the Common Core come "mainly from
the right" ignores or dismisses serious criticisms from well-respected
experts.
They
include these points:
There
is no rationale for the common core: The major reason for our unspectacular
school achievement is our level of child poverty, now 23%, the second highest
child poverty level among 35 “economically advanced” countries. Poverty has a devastating impact on school
performance. When we control for poverty, American children's international
test scores are near the top of the world.
There
is no evidence that more rigorous standards and increased testing improve
school performance.
There
is strong evidence that that protecting children from the effects of poverty will
increase school performance: Strengthening food and health care programs, and
providing better support for libraries and librarians is a much better
investment than the common core.
These
criticism do not come only from the "right."
Stephen
Krashen
Some
sources:
Child Poverty rate: UNICEF, 2007. An Overview of Child-Well Being in Rich Countries. UNICEF
Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card 7. The United Nations Childrens Fund).
Control
for poverty:
Carnoy,
M and Rothstein, R. 2013, What Do
International Tests Really Show Us about U.S. Student Performance.
Washington DC: Economic Policy Institute. 2012. http://www.epi.org/).
" ... no evidence that installing more
rigorous standards and increasing testing has ever increased school
performance": There is no evidence
standards and tests have improved student learning: Nichols, S., Glass, G., and
Berliner, D. 2006. High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does
accountability increase student learning? Education Policy Archives 14(1). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/. OECD. Tienken, C., 2011. Common core standards:
An example of data-less decision-making. Journal of Scholarship and Practice.
American Association of School Administrators [AASA], 7(4): 3-18. http://www.aasa.org/jsp.aspx.
Increasing
testing: Krashen, S. 2012. How much
testing? http://dianeravitch.net/2012/07/25/stephen-‐ krashen-‐how-‐much-‐testing/
and: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/
"Strengthening food
programs, increading health care,
providing more access to books": Berliner, D. 2009. Poverty and Potential: Out-of-School Factors and School
Success. Boulder and Tempe: Education
and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. http://epicpolicy.org/publication/poverty-and-potential; Krashen, S., Lee, SY, and McQuillan, J.
2012. Is The Library Important? Multivariate Studies at the National and
International Level Journal of Language and Literacy Education: 8(1). http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/
No comments:
Post a Comment