Saturday, November 12, 2016

Ben Carson as secretary of education?

Sent to the New York Times
Zapatero a su zapatos

Re: Donald Trump is picking his cabinet: Here's a short list" (Nov. 12).

If Ben Carson, a retired  neurosurgeon,, is qualified to become US Secretary of Education, I am qualified to be appointed surgeon-general.

Stephen Krashen, PhD
Professor Emeritus of Education
University of Southern California

Note: Zapatero a su zapatos = stick to your area of competence.
Hat tip: Viviana Bonafede


Friday, November 11, 2016

Suggestions for the US Department of Education

Stephen Krashen, November, 2016

These are suggested priorities for the US Department of Education for the next four years. None of the idea presented here are original with me, and I will provide sources and supporting evidence for the suggestions at a later time.

Focus on poverty

By far the most consistent and powerful predictor of school achievement is poverty.  In fact, when researchers control for the effect of poverty, American students rank near the top of the world on international tests.

The current view of the US Department of Education is that improving education will reduce the rate of poverty, but there is strong evidence that the causality goes in the opposite direction, supporting Martin Luther King’s position: "We are likely to find that the problems of housing and education, instead of preceding the elimination of poverty, will themselves be affected if poverty is first abolished”(Martin Luther King, 1967, Final Words of Advice).

Until we achieve full employment at a living wage, the real cure for poverty, the Department of Education can improve the situation immediately by protecting children from at least some of the effects of poverty. Children of poverty suffer from food deprivation, lack of proper health care, and have very limited access to reading material. We can act immediately to improve school food programs, improve access to school nurses, and provide more support school libraries and librarians.

More flexible expectations

The Department of Education can also improve matters immediately by encouraging more flexible expectations for school completion: Announcing high school graduation rates based only those who graduate "on time" (in four years) sends the message that there is something wrong with taking longer.  Education expert Susan Ohanian tells us that during the depression, her father went to high school every other year, working to help support the family during the years when he wasn't in school.  Taking longer than the usual four years is often an indication of persistence and determination, not laziness. Using today's measures, he would be classified as a dropout.

Help students find their paths

The Department of Education should not promote specific careers based on (often inaccurate) current perceptions of national needs. Rather, school should provide an environment in which students discover their individual interests and talents, and help them develop these interests and talents.

This requires a re-analysis of the need for college. The official position of the US government is that on finishing high-school students should be “college or career ready,” but in practice the focus is clearly on college. This is reflected not only in statements from the Department of Education, but also in the content of the Common Core, clearly a college prep program.

College is right for many many students. But it is not right for everybody. College is not better, it is different.  Many young people have talents and interests that are not well-served by college, and they deserve the chance to develop in different ways.  Both young people and society profit when we respect diversity, and both suffer when we do not:  John Gardner, Former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, tried to warn us years ago: “The society which scorns excellence in plumbing as a humble activity and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy: neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water.”


Reduce STEM fever

There is no question that computer use should be included in school, but this does not mean that every child should be preparing for a career in computer science or STEM.  Study after study has shown that there is no STEM crisis, no shortage of STEM workers. In fact, in many areas, there is a surplus. 

NUT: No Unnecessary Testing

Limit standardized testing to what has been demonstrated to be helpful to teachers and students.  If we do this, there will be more than enough money available to significantly improve food programs, health care, and libraries (see above). 
   

Recess

Recess will be brought back and in the form of free play, not organized activities. Administrators in elementary schools that do not allow recess should lose their coffee breaks.


In summary, I suggest that we immediately do a better job protecting students from the impact of poverty, help students find their own paths, and eliminate unnecessary testing.  This can be done easily, will save money, and will result in considerable improvement in the lives of millions of students and teachers, while at the same time increasing academic achievement.


Monday, November 7, 2016

Announcement of my interest in becoming US Secretary of Education

Stephen Krashen  November 7, 2016.

According to the BAT organization's poll, I was one of those mentioned as a possible candidate for the position of Secretary of Education. If appointed, here is some of my platform. Most of the ideas are not my own, and I will supply full documentation if my candidacy develops.

Focus on poverty

By far the most consistent and powerful predictor of school achievement is poverty.  In fact, when researchers control for the effect of poverty, American students rank near the top of the world on international tests.

The current view of the US Department of Education is that improving education will reduce the rate of poverty, but there is strong evidence that the causality goes in the opposite direction, supporting Martin Luther King’s position: "We are likely to find that the problems of housing and education, instead of preceding the elimination of poverty, will themselves be affected if poverty is first abolished”(Martin Luther King, 1967, Final Words of Advice).

Until we achieve full employment at a living wage, the real cure for poverty, the Department of Education can improve the situation immediately by protecting children from at least some of the effects of poverty. Children of poverty suffer from food deprivation, lack of proper health care, and have very limited access to reading material. This means we must immediately act to improve school food programs, improve access to school nurses, and support school libraries and librarians.

More flexible expectations

The Department of Education can also improve matters immediately by encouraging more flexible expectations for school completion: Announcing high school graduation rates based only those who graduate "on time" (in four years) sends the message that there is something wrong with taking longer.  Education expert Susan Ohanian tells us that during the depression, her father went to high school every other year, working to help support the family when he wasn't in school.  Taking longer than the usual four years is often an indication of persistence and determination, not laziness. Using today's measures, he would be classified as a dropout.

Help students find their paths

The Department of Education should not promote specific careers based on (often inaccurate) current perceptions of national needs. Rather, school should provide an environment in which students discover their individual interests and talents, and help them develop these interests and talents.

This requires a re-analysis of the need for college. The official position of the US government is that on finishing high-school students should be “college or career ready,” but in practice the focus is clearly on college. This is reflected not only in statements from the Department of Education, but also in the content of the Common Core, clearly a college prep program.

College is right for many many students. But it is not right for everybody. College is not better, it is different.  Many young people have talents and interests that are not well-served by college, and they deserve the chance to develop in different ways.  Both young people and society profit when we respect diversity, and both suffer when we do not:  John Gardner, Former Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, tried to warn us years ago: “The society which scorns excellence in plumbing as a humble activity and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy: neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water.”


Reduce STEM fever

There is no question that computer use should be included in school, but this does not mean that every child should be preparing for a career in computer science or STEM.  Study after study has shown that there is no STEM crisis, no shortage of STEM workers. In fact, in many areas, there is a surplus. 

NUT: No Unnecessary Testing

Limit standardized testing to what has been demonstrated to be helpful to teachers and students.  If we do this, there will be more than enough money available to significantly improve food programs, health care, and libraries (see above). 


Recess

Recess will be brought back and in the form of free play, not organized activities. Administrators in elementary schools that do not allow recess should lose their coffee breaks. c


As Secretary of Education, I will work to immediately protect students from the impact of poverty, help students find their own paths, and eliminate unnecessary testing.  This can be done easily, will save money, and will result in considerable improvement in the lives of millions of students and teachers, while at the same time increasing academic achievement.


Sunday, November 6, 2016

Yes on 58

Published in the Malibu Times, Nov. 3, 2016
I was very happy to read Malibu Times Publisher Arnold York’s endorsement of Proposition 58 (Oct. 19). Mr. York is correct in saying that dismantling bilingual education in 1998 (Proposition 227) did not speed up English language acquisition. Research has shown no obvious improvement in English language development resulting from the passage of Prop. 227. Careful scientific studies have also shown that students in quality bilingual programs outperform students with similar backgrounds on tests of English.
Stephen Krashen

Wednesday, November 2, 2016

Looking for more on State Assembly candidates’ education positions


Published in the Malibu Surfside News, November 2, 2016
http://www.malibusurfsidenews.com/letters-editor/letters-editor-nov-2
Dear Editor,
I have examined State Assembly candidates Richard Bloom and Matthew Craffey websites, and have found very little information about their positions on education. One of the primary responsibilities of state government is education, but other than pious pronouncements that education is “important,” and be available, the candidates rarely mention it.
Here are issues that I think need to be discussed:
Our students are being pushed into excessive amounts of science, technology, engineering and math (“STEM”) regardless of their personal interests because of the widespread belief that there is a shortage of American experts in these fields. Several studies have shown, however, that this is not so. Are the candidates aware of this issue?  
- California has consistently has very low reading scores. Research relates this problem to a lack of investment in libraries and librarians. Are the candidates committed to more support for our libraries and librarians?
- Bilingual education was dismantled in California in 1998 by Proposition 227, despite strong evidence that properly organized bilingual programs help language minority children acquire academic English. In the November elections Californians will vote on Proposition 58, which would reverse aspects of 227 and once again allow districts to set up bilingual programs that help minority students. Do the candidates have a position on bilingual education?
- Children today undergo a massive amount of unnecessary and expensive testing that does not contribute to their learning. Arizona State University professor David Berliner has reported that increasing testing does not increase school achievement. Have the candidates carefully examined the impact of testing on our students?
- There is a strong movement from publishing and computer companies toward “competency-based education,” a new form of online programmed learning that may result in daily testing. There is little evidence that it works. A report from the National Governor’s Association states that there have been “only a few rigorous evaluations” of these programs.  How do the candidates feel about competency-based education?
About 40 percent of the state general fund budget goes to K-12 education, and another 10 percent to higher education. I hope that Mr. Craffey and Mr. Bloom will present their positions on educational issues.
Stephen Krashen, Professor Emeritus, University of Southern California

Friday, October 28, 2016

Children should not be allowed to behave like children


Pulished in the Star-Tribune, October 25, 2016

I am happy to know that Minnesota really understands the importance of rigor in kindergarten ("Across state, kindergarten is becoming the new first grade," Oct. 24).
   The unfortunate tendency of children to want to enjoy themselves must stop, despite claims of mushy-minded "experts" who claim that play improves "social and emotional development," whatever that is.
   We must maintain our economic and military superiority. Children should not be allowed to behave like children.
Stephen Krashen
President, Kindergarten Kalculus Association


Letter published: http://www.startribune.com/readers-write-oct-25-academic-rigor-in-kindergarten-legislative-pay-amendment-health-insurance-bob-dylan-s-prize/398263261/

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Alice in Wonderland journalism: Competency-based education - Sentence first ... verdict afterwards




“Sentence first…verdict afterwards." -The Queen (Alice in Wonderland)
Sent to the Concord Monitor, Oct 27

The Concord Monitor is enthusiastic about competency-based education (CBE) ("Pittsfield Elementary School adopts competency-based, multi-age classroom program," Oct 27).
CBE is course-work delivered online to schools, with content generally based on the common core. Students work individually on computers, and are allowed to move from module to module only when they have "mastered" the current module. Mastery is determined by passing a test, also delivered online.  Testing is thus now a daily fact of schools using CBE.
CBE modules must contain material that is specific and measurable, that is, easy to test. This severely limits what can be included in class.
It is claimed that CBE is "personalized," but only rate of working through the programs is truly personalized. Given the fact that speed of working through modules is the criterion for determining student, teacher, and school success, the pressure on students to work quickly is strong.
A recent report from the National Governor's Association, a group enthusiastic about CBE, includes this statement: "Although an emerging research base suggests that CBE is a promising model, it includes only a few rigorous evaluations and analyses of current and ongoing CBE pilots and similar programs." 

In other words, we have no hard evidence showing that this expensive program increases student progress or that it even results in students making satisfactory progress.

 

Stephen Krashen

Professor Emeritus

University of Southern California

 

 

Source:

National Governor's Association, 2015: "Expanding Student Success: A Primer on Competency-Based Education from Kindergarten Through Higher Education." www.nga. org